
|
Experts: Domestic-partner perks bolster
staffs, retention "I thought it was very progressive and open for that company," said Ensberg, who is gay. "It was so unknown really, then, for most companies." Ensberg ended up not taking that job, however, because when he
told his boss, Applebee's chief people officer, Lou Kaucic,
why he intended to leave, Kaucic asked him to stay
and help get domestic-partner benefits started at the Overland Park-based
casual-dining-segment leader.
Applebee's is
now among several restaurant companies that provide health benefits to
unmarried partners of employees. At a time when gay and lesbian marriage is a
hotly contested topic in courts and legislatures around the country, the
number of American businesses offering the benefit is rising. About one-third
of Fortune 500 companies provided benefits to domestic partners in 2002, 13
percent more than those that did so in the prior year, according to the Human
Rights Campaign, or HRC, a national gay and lesbian organization based in HRC listed
nine restaurant and foodservice contract companies that offer partner
benefits, and People Report, a About 9
percent of People Report members also offered the benefits in 2003 to
part-time hourly employees. The restaurant chains' People Report tracks
represent 12,798 restaurants, 45,865 managers and 638,412 hourly workers. While the
restaurant industry may lag behind other industries in providing partner
benefits, some operators and human-resources executives argue that those
benefits may help to attract and retain good employees and stay competitive. Carlson Restaurants Worldwide,
the Dallas-based parent of T.G.I.
Friday's restaurants, began including the benefit to salaried employees a
year ago, according to Anne Varano, senior vice
president of human resources. "It was
really to make sure we were offering comparable benefits to all our
employees," Varano said. "It's part of
our culture of inclusion. We want to value all our employees equally." Some
restaurant executives who asked not to be identified said their companies do
not offer the benefits because their organizations are too conservative or
because their restaurants operate in states that do not recognize civil
unions or marriages between same-sex partners. Legal
skirmishes have been flaring up around the country in recent months over gay
and lesbian unions. HRC reported that some 7,000 gay and lesbian couples have
gotten married in the Last month And
nationally, Congress is considering an amendment to the Constitution to
define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Despite all
the controversy and politics, restaurant operators said their decisions to
offer domestic partner benefits simply have been a response to employees'
requests. Dallas-based Brinker
International Inc. instituted the benefit in January for salaried
managers because of employee interest, spokesman Louis Adams said. "This
was a component some people were looking for, and so we added it," Red Lobster and Olive Garden parent Darden Restaurants Inc. of "We
talked to our folks, and there was clearly a demand for it," said Jim Lynde, former vice president of human resources for Red
Lobster. "People wanted to be able to extend the same benefits to the
people who were important in their lives." The costs are
fairly nominal for operators as the benefit is basically the same offered to
married couples, human-resources executives indicate. It's a red
herring if a company complains it cannot afford domestic-partner benefits,
asserted Daryl Herrschaft, a spokesman for the HRC
in "In
fact, it's likely to be less expensive, as domestic partners tend to be
younger and have fewer children," he said. After Ensberg had agreed to stay with Applebee's, he made a
presentation on the advantages of having a corporate domestic partnership
benefit to Kaucic, chief executive Lloyd Hill and
the chain's executive staff. "It was
a no-brainer," Kaucic said. "We have
everything to gain at no cost. It was one of those easy, progressive tools to
implement. It's been a yawner ever since." Applebee's benefits are for
both opposite- and same-sex unmarried couples, and heterosexual couples are
using it the most, Kaucic said. About 75 percent of
couples who signed up for it are heterosexual. "We
thought it was going to be a gay benefit or could be, but the primary users
are straight couples living together," he said. |